Composite Distress Profile: Development of a Standardised Measure for Quantification of Multidimensional Distress Faced by Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer


  • Simmy M Varkey mahatma gandhi university
  • Mary Lucita
  • Varghese P Punnoose



Background: Biobehavioural distress is comorbid in most chronic health conditions. Currently, there is a void of a standardised tool which measures distress faced by chronic diabetic foot ulcer patients.

Aims: To develop a new scale for measuring composite distress and to examine its psychometric properties.

Composite Distress Profile (CDP), a questionnaire to assess composite distress in patients with diabetic foot ulcer, was developed using inputs from 11 patients with the condition. Content validity was ensured by incorporating suggestions from 30 experts. CDP was then applied to 60 patients with diabetic foot ulcer twice at an interval of two weeks. Construct validity of CDP was examined by doing contrasted groups approach using WHO BREF-QOL. Criterion validity was examined by doing correlation with scores in SUBI (Subjective wellbeing inventory). Reliability was computed by test-retest reliability.

The final CDP scale has 50-items in a five-domain structure. CDP scores negatively correlated with SUBI. Overall and domain wise test–retest reliability computed using Pearson’s product moment correlation ranged from 0.976 to 0.989. When CDP was applied to three groups of patients grouped on the basis of scores obtained in WHO BREF-QOL, statistically significant difference was obtained between the groups in ANOVA F test [F (df2, 57) =30.98; p=<0.01], proving that CDP has construct validity.

Conclusion: CDP will help healthcare workers to quantify in depth data about different attributes of distress faced by diabetic foot ulcer patients, and might help in early psychological interventions for vulnerable patients.

Author Biography

Simmy M Varkey, mahatma gandhi university

Research scholar -school of behavioral sciences,MG University


Dey AB, Soneja S, Nagarkar KM, Jhingan HP. Evaluation of the health and functional status of older Indians as a prelude to the development of a health programme. Natl Med J India;14(3):135–8.

Saylor C. The circle of health: a health definition model. J Holist Nurs 2004;22(2):97–115.

Spiegel D. Healing words: emotional expression and disease outcome. JAMA 1999;281(14):1328-9

Olive P. The holistic nursing care of patients with minor injuries attending the A&E department. Accid Emerg Nurs 2003;11(1):27-32.

Powell T. Consultation-liaison psychiatry and clinical ethics: representative cases. Psychosomatics 1997;38(4):321-6.

Frykberg RG, Zgonis T, Armstrong DG, Driver VR, Giurini JM, Kravitz SR, et al. diabetic foot disorders: a clinical practice guideline. J Foot Ankle 2006; 45(5 Suppl):S1-66.

Mohan V, Sandeep S, Deepa R, Shah B, Varghese C. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes: Indian scenario. Indian J Med Res 2007;125(3):217–30.

American Diabetes Association [Internet]. Statistics About Diabetes. [cited 2nd October 2016] Available from:

Lazzarini PA, O’Rourke SR, Russell AW, Clark D, Kuys SS. What are the key conditions associated with lower limb amputations in a major Australian teaching hospital? J Foot Ankle Res 2012;30;5(1):12.

Kumar A, Jain C, Varma AK, Mangalanandan, Kumar H. A decade of experience in managing diabetic foot at amrita, India’s largest diabetic limb salvage centre. J diabet foot complicat 2013;5(1):15–7.

Sithara SP. The impact of diabetic foot ulcer on health related quality of life (HRQL) and employment among rural diabetic population in south Kerala. SCTIMST study reports. Dissertation for Master of Public Health 2012; [cited 2nd October 2016] Available from:

Pande N, Tewari S. Understanding Coping with Distress due to Physical Disability. Psychol Dev Soc 2011; 15(2): 95-110.

Jyothylekshmy V, Menon AS, Abraham S. Epidemiology of diabetic foot complications in a podiatry clinic of a tertiary hospital in South India. Indian Journal of Health Sciences 2015, 8(1):48-51.

Bijl R, Graaf R de, Hiripi E, Kessler R. The prevalence of treated and untreated mental disorders in five countries. Health Aff 2003;22(3):122-33.

Joshi K, Kumar R, Avasthi A. Morbidity profile and its relationship with disability and psychological distress among elderly people in Northern India. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32(6):978–87.

Passik S, Dugan W. Oncologists’ recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16(4):1594-600.

ICF, WHO. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. 2009.

Edelman C, Mandle C, Coralli C. Health Promotion Throughout the Lifespan. Nurse Pract 1987;23(1):25-36.

Kendler KS, Gardner CO. Dependent stressful life events and prior depressive episodes in the prediction of major depression: the problem of causal inference in psychiatric epidemiology. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 33(1):82.

Pargament KI, Koenig HG, Tarakeshwar N, Hahn J. Religious coping methods as predictors of psychological, physical and spiritual outcomes among medically ill elderly patients: a two-year longitudinal study. J Health Psychol2004;9(6):713-30.

Lewis-Beck M, Bryman A, Futing Liao T. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods [Internet]. California: Sage Publications; 2004 [cited 2nd October 2016] Available from:

World Health Organization [Internet]. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. [cited 2nd October 2016] Available from:




How to Cite

Varkey, S. M., Lucita, M., & Punnoose, V. P. (2016). Composite Distress Profile: Development of a Standardised Measure for Quantification of Multidimensional Distress Faced by Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Kerala Journal of Psychiatry, 29(1), 30–37.



Research Report