Coping Strategies and Psychological Wellbeing Among Undergraduate Students Affected by Cyberbullying: A Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30834/KJP.38.2.2025.516Keywords:
Cyberbullying, Coping Behavior, Psychological Well-Being, Undergraduate Students, Mental HealthAbstract
Background: Cyberbullying is an emerging concern among undergraduate students, potentially affecting their mental health and academic life. Understanding how students cope with such experiences is crucial for designing effective support systems. This study aimed to identify coping strategies employed by undergraduate students experiencing cyberbullying and to examine the association between these strategies and psychological well-being.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 744 undergraduate students selected through multistage random sampling from colleges in Khammam city, Telangana, South India. Data were collected using validated instruments: The Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization Questionnaire, the Coping with Cyberbullying Questionnaire, and the Psychological Wellbeing Scale. Descriptive statistics summarized participant characteristics, and Chi-square tests assessed associations between cyberbullying status and psychological well-being subscales.
Results: Among the participants, 40.3% reported being victims of cyberbullying and 25.5% admitted to perpetrating it; 32.3% were both victims and perpetrators. Technical coping strategies such as blocking or reporting perpetrators (mean = 20.52) and seeking close support from friends and family (mean = 17.94) were most frequently used, whereas retaliation was least common (mean = 15.03). No significant associations were found between experiences of cyberbullying or cybervictimization and any psychological well-being subscales (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Undergraduate students predominantly adopt practical coping strategies, notably technical measures and social support, when facing cyberbullying. The absence of a significant link between cyberbullying experiences and overall psychological well-being suggests that other factors, such as pre-existing mental health and social support, may play a more pivotal role. Strengthening institutional support systems and promoting healthy coping mechanisms remain essential to address the psychosocial impact of cyberbullying.
Downloads
References
Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bias-based cyberbullying among early adolescents: associations with cognitive and affective empathy. J Early Adolesc. 2022; 42(9):1204-1235.
Nazir T, Thabassum L. Cyberbullying: definition, types, effects, related factors and precautions to be taken during COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Indian Psychology. 2021;9(2):417-425.
Kaur M, Saini M. Indian government initiatives on cyberbullying: a case study on cyberbullying in Indian higher education institutions. Educ Inf Technol. 2023; 28(1):581-615.
Sandhu D, Kaur K. Cyberbullying and online negative experiences of school and college students in India. In: Misra G, Misra R, editors. Understanding Psychology in the Context of Relationship, Community, Workplace and Culture. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2022. p. 121-140.
Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J, Cutts H. High school students’ perceptions of coping with cyberbullying. Youth Soc. 2012; 44(2):284-306.
Heiman T, Olenik-Shemesh D, Frank G. Patterns of coping with cyberbullying: emotional, behavioral, and strategic coping reactions among middle school students. Violence Vict. 2019; 34(1):28-45.
Kumar VL, Goldstein MA. Cyberbullying and adolescents. Curr Pediatr Rep. 2020; 8:86-92.
Nixon CL. Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014; 5:143-158.
Sticca F, Machmutow K, Stauber A, Perren S, Palladino BE, Nocentini A, et al. The coping with cyberbullying questionnaire: development of a new measure. Societies. 2015; 5(2):515-536.
Garcia D, Kazemitabar M, Asgarabad MH. The 18-item Swedish version of Ryff’s psychological wellbeing scale: psychometric properties based on classical test theory and item response theory. Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1208300.
Schneider SK, O'Donnell L, Stueve A, Coulter RW. Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: a regional census of high school students. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(1):171-177.
Kowalski RM, Limber SP, McCord A. A developmental perspective on cyberbullying. Child Dev Perspect. 2019; 13(3):140-145.
Ragusa A, Núñez-Rodríguez S, Vaz P, Silva J, Caliciotti V, González-Bernal JJ, et al. Impact of Cyberbullying on Academic Performance and Psychosocial Well-Being of Italian Students. Children (Basel). 2024; 11(8):943.
Machackova H, Cerna A, Sevcikova A, Dedkova L, Daneback K. Effectiveness of coping strategies for victims of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology. 2013; 7(3).
Price M, Dalgleish J. Cyberbullying: experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Stud Aust. 2010; 29(2):51-59.
Perren S, Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger E. Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. Eur J Dev Psychol. 2012; 9(2):195-209.
Rus M, Sandu ML, Calin FM. Impact of bullying behaviors on mental health among adolescents: an analysis of interpersonal relationships in school settings. J Infrastruct Policy Dev. 2024; 8(15):10437.
Herd T, Kim-Spoon J. A systematic review of associations between adverse peer experiences and emotion regulation in adolescence. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2021; 24(1):141-163.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Md Adil Faizan, Prashanth Challuri, Govindappagari Venkata Jithendra, Tejasvi Sakhamuri, M Raghuram, M Pramod kumar (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


