RESEARCH REPORT

 

OPEN ACCESS | Research Report | Published Online: 7^th  July 2025                                                                           

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS, COURSE OF ILLNESS, SUBSTANCE USE PATTERN, AND QUALITY OF LIFE BETWEEN PATIENTS WITH BIPOLAR AND UNIPOLAR DEPRESSION 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

M Goutham Kiran¹, Roy Abraham Kallivayalil², Joice Geo³,

1. Consultant Psychiatrist, Consultant InMind (Institute for Mind And Brain) Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala 2. Professor Emeritus, 3. Professor and Head, Department of Psychiatry, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Thiruvalla, Kerala.

*Corresponding Author: Professor and Head, Department of Psychiatry, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Thiruvalla, Kerala.

Email: drjoicegeo@gmail.com    

INTRODUCTION

 

 

Bipolar and unipolar depression are often clinically indistinguishable, contributing to frequent misdiagnosis. Studies estimate a delay of 7 to 10 years from the onset of symptoms to the accurate diagnosis of bipolar disorder, often resulting in inappropriate treatment, treatment resistance, or a manic switch. Mixed symptoms, psychomotor agitation, early age of onset, a greater number of prior episodes, and a family history of bipolar disorder are also more frequently seen in bipolar depression.¹

Bipolar depression is more often associated  longer illness duration, higher frequency of hospitalizations, and increased prevalence of substance use, particularly alcohol and cannabis. Additional findings include higher rates of insomnia, mood-related somatic symptoms, and poor insight in patients with mixed features, all of which may reflect an underlying vulnerability to bipolarity⁵.

Quality of life (QOL) impairments are common in both unipolar and bipolar depression; however, individuals with bipolar depression often report disproportionately lower psychological well-being, even when symptom severity is comparable. This may reflect deeper emotional distress, greater cognitive disruption, and a higher burden of hopelessness, all of which contribute to increased functional impairment and suicide risk³.Long-term functional impairment is substantially higher in bipolar I and II disorders compared to unipolar depression, underscoring the chronicity and greater morbidity associated with bipolarity⁶.

Given the high prevalence of unipolar and bipolar depression in tertiary care centres, this study aims to compare clinical characteristics, illness trajectory, substance use patterns, and quality of life in both conditions. Understanding these distinctions will help tailor more effective treatment strategies and enhance patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in South India, after the approval of ethics committee, to compare the clinical characteristics, course of illness, substance use patterns, and quality of life between patients diagnosed with unipolar and bipolar depression based on DSM-5 criteria. The study was conducted from December 2022 to June 2024.

The sample size was calculated using the formula: where:

• n is the sample size.
• represents the critical value from the standard normal distribution corresponding to the desired confidence level.
• P₁? is the expected proportion of the outcome in the first group.
• P₂ is the expected proportion of the outcome in the second group
• d is the minimum clinically or practically significant difference between the two proportions (P₁- P₂)

Assuming a 95% confidence interval and 80% power, based on the prevalence of severe depression in the bipolar group (80%) and unipolar group (60%) according to a study⁷ conducted in South India, the required minimum sample size was 64 in each group.

 A total of 70 patients, each aged 18–65 years, were recruited from the psychiatry outpatient and inpatient departments, with inclusion criteria requiring a confirmed diagnosis of either unipolar or bipolar depression (current depressive episode). Patients with major psychiatric comorbidities or cognitive impairments were excluded. Consecutive sampling was used to select participants who met the inclusion criteria. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from clinical history, including age of onset, episode frequency, hospitalizations, psychotic symptoms, and family history. Standardized assessment tools were used: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) for depression severity, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) for psychiatric symptoms, WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) for quality of life, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) for alcohol dependence, and Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence for nicotine use. All assessment scales were administered simultaneously to ensure consistency. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software, with descriptive and inferential tests such as independent t-tests and chi-square tests to compare groups, and correlation analyses to assess relationships between clinical symptoms and quality of life. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee, and informed consent was secured from all participants, ensuring confidentiality and voluntary participation.

 

RESULTS

A total of 140 participants (70 in each group) were included in the study. Females were more affected in both groups, with 43 cases (61.4%) in Unipolar Depression (UD) and 38 cases (54.3%) in Bipolar Depression (BD)(Table 1). Regarding marital status, married individuals formed the majority in both groups, with 44 cases in UD and 40 cases in BD. However, divorced or separated individuals were significantly more common in BD (12 cases) compared to UD (5 cases).When considering educational background, no cases of individuals without a formal educationwere recorded in either group. Intermediate-level education was more common in BD (24 cases) compared to UD (16 cases). However, diploma and graduate holders were more prevalent in UD (20 and 15 cases, respectively) than in BD(Table 1).Occupational distribution revealed that unskilled workers had a higher prevalence of BD (25 cases) compared to those in the UD category (19 cases), while homemakers and professionals were more affected by UD. (Table 1).Family structure and living environment also played a role in depression prevalence. Nuclear families had the highest prevalence of both UD (52 cases) and BD (61 cases), while joint family structures had fewer cases. Additionally, UD was more prevalent in rural areas (31 cases), whereas BD was more common in urban areas (28 cases(Table 1).

Psychomotor activity was assessed, revealing that BD had a higher prevalence of decreased psychomotor activity (37 cases) and increased activity (11 cases) compared to UD (31 and 5 cases, respectively). However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (?² = 5.35, p = 0.069)The presence of psychotic symptoms, delusions, and hallucinations was significantly higher in Bipolar Depression (BD) compared to Unipolar Depression (UD), with 45, 39, and 6 cases, respectively, in BD. In contrast, UD had 24, 21, and 3 cases. In contrast, fatigue, anhedonia, and hypersomnia were slightly more prevalent in UD. Moreover, suicidal thoughts and self-harm were more frequent in BD, indicating a higher risk of self-injurious behaviours in this group. (Table1) 

Table 1: Comparison of Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Unipolar and        Bipolar Depression

Clinical Characteristics	Unipolar Depression	Bipolar Depression	Test	P-value
Insomnia	38 (54.3%)	47 (67.1%)	?² = 1.92	0.166
Hypersomnia	12 (17.1%)	9 (12.9%)	?² = 0.56	0.456
Decreased Appetite	32 (45.7%)	37 (52.9%)	?² = 0.72	0.397
Increased Appetite	4 (5.7%)	12 (17.1%)	Fisher's Exact Test	0.035
Fatigue	38 (54.3%)	31 (44.3%)	?² = 1.13	0.288
Anhedonia	40 (57.1%)	34 (48.6%)	?² = 1.03	0.309
Difficulty in concentrating	36 (51.4%)	38 (54.3%)	?² = 0.36	0.548
Postpartum Onset	5 (7.1%)	8 (11.4%)	Fisher's Exact Test	0.231
Feelings of Guilt	27 (38.6%)	33 (47.1%)	?² = 0.79	0.373
Suicidal thoughts/ ideations	31 (44.3%)	42 (60.0%)	?² = 2.78	0.095
Deliberate self-harm	16 (22.9%)	12 (17.1%)	?² = 0.73	0.392
Decreased Psychomotor Activity	31 (44.3%)	37 (52.9%)	?² = 0.52	0.470
Increased Psychomotor Activity	5 (7.1%)	11 (15.7%)	?² = 1.67	0.197
Psychotic symptoms	24 (34.3%)	45 (64.3%)	?² = 9.97	0.002
Delusions	21 (30.0%)	39 (55.7%)	?² = 6.58	0.010
Hallucinations	3 (4.3%)	6 (8.6%)	Fisher's Exact Test	0.136

 

Bipolar Depression had an earlier onset, with the majority of cases (93%) occurring before 40 years of age, including 28 cases under 20 years. In contrast, Unipolar Depression exhibited a broader distribution, with the highest prevalence in the 20-40 years age group (34 cases), followed by 40-60 years (26 cases).The number of episodes varied significantly between Unipolar Depression (UD) and Bipolar Depression (BD). UD predominantly had fewer episodes, with 41 cases reporting fewer than five episodes. In contrast, BD was associated with a higher number of depressive episodes, with 38 cases experiencing 5-10 depressive episodes and 13 cases exceeding 10 depressive episodes. A chi-square test (?² = 15.51, p = 0.0004) indicated a statistically significant difference in the number of episodes between the two groups. The mean duration of depressive episodes also differed between the two disorders. In UD, the mean duration of depressive episodes was found to be 91.28 days. In contrast, the mean duration of depressive episodes in BD was found to be 144.57 days, indicating a statistically significant difference in mean episode duration (t = 2.69, p = 0.009).Hospitalization trends further highlighted the severity of BD compared to UD. UD had fewer hospitalizations, with 54 cases having 0-5 hospitalizations. BD had significantly more hospitalizations, with 39 cases falling within the 5-10 range and 9 cases exceeding 10 hospitalizations. Manic episodes were not taken into consideration when recording the number of hospitalizations. The chi-square test (?² = 30.54, p < 0.001) confirmed a highly significant difference. 

Table 2: Course of Illness in Patients with Unipolar and Bipolar Depression

Category	Unipolar Depression (N=70)	Bipolar Depression (N=70)	Test	P-Value
Age of Onset <20 years	10 (14.3%)	28 (40.0%)	?² = 13.91	<0.001
Age of Onset 20-40 years	34 (48.6%)	37 (52.9%)
Age of Onset 40-60 years	26 (37.1%)	5 (7.1%)
Episodes <5	41 (58.6%)	19 (27.1%)	?² = 15.51	0.0004
Episodes 5-10	25 (35.7%)	38 (54.3%)
Episodes >10	4 (5.7%)	13 (18.6%)
Average Duration of Depressive Episodes