Interactive workshop on writing and publishing research: reflections and lessons learned
Keywords:scientific writing, publishing, workshop, interactive
Publishing research is an essential skill for health professionals. In India, few training programs are specifically aimed to improve scientific writing. We developed a two-day interactive training workshop to address the need of the researchers. Methods such as targeted Facebook advertising and sending emails to available collections of addresses were used to inform potential participants from diverse disciplines about the program. There were 48 participants from 15 disciplines. Half of them were females, and half were from Psychiatry. We reflected on the content and experience of the workshop and have summarized the lessons learned from it. The participants perceived the workshop to be useful and found the experience satisfying.
Menon V, Varadharajan N, Praharaj SK, Ameen S. Why do manuscripts get rejected? A content analysis of rejection reports from Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. Indian J Psychol Med (in press). doi: 10.1177/0253717620965845
Sommers PS, Muller JH, Bailiff PJ, Stephens GG. Writing for publication: A workshop to prepare faculty as medical writers. Fam Med 1996;28:650-4.
Edwards R, White M, Gray J, Fischbacher C. Use of a journal club and letter-writing exercise to teach critical appraisal to medical undergraduates. Med Educ 2001;35:691-4.
Sridhar AR, Willett LL, Castiglioni A, Heudebert G, Landry M, Centor RM, et al. Scholarship opportunities for trainees and clinician educators: learning outcomes from a case report writing workshop. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:398–401.
Jawaid M, Masood Z, Alam SN, Jawaid SA. An analysis of interactive hands-on workshops on medical writing. J Pak Med Assoc 2011;61:66-70.
Guydish J, Masson C, Flentje A, Shopshire M, Sorensen JL. Scientific writing seminar for early-stage investigators in substance abuse research. Subst Abus 2016;37:238-41.
Fernández E, García AM, Serés E, Bosch F. Students’ satisfaction and perceived impact on knowledge, attitudes and skills after a 2-day course in scientific writing: a prospective longitudinal study in Spain. BMJ Open 2018;8:e018657.
Wajekar AS, Salgaonkar SV, Chincholi IH, Shetty AN. Impact of basic medical writing workshop on case report writing by postgraduate anaesthesia trainees: A pilot study. Indian J Anaesth 2018;62:502-8.
Galipeau J, Moher D, Campbell C, Hendry P, Cameron DW, Palepu A, et al. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:257-65.
Barroga E, Vardaman M. Essential components of educational programs on biomedical writing, editing, and publishing. J Korean Med Sci 2015;30:1381-7.
Richardson ML, Shaffer K, Amini B, Spittler NLJ. Advanced, interactive, image-based education: technology and pedagogy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020;49:74-81.
Macznik AK, Ribeiro DC, Baxter GD. Online technology use in physiotherapy teaching and learning: a systematic review of effectiveness and users’ perceptions. BMC Med Educ 2015;15:160.
Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ 2019;53:76-85.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Kerala Journal of Psychiatry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.