Developing Peer Review System for a Small Journal - The KJP Experience

Authors

  • Shahul Ameen Consultant Psychiatrist, Puthujeevan Trust Hospital for Psychological Medicine, Kottamury; St. Thomas Hospital, Chethipuzha. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4734-2628
  • Samir Kumar Praharaj Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shaji S, Promodu K, Abraham T, Roy KJ, Verghese A. An epidemiological study of dementia in a rural community in Kerala, India. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 168(6):745-9.

Shaji S, Bose S, Verghese A. Prevalence of dementia in an urban population in Kerala, India. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186:136-40.

Rennie D. Editorial peer review: its development and rationale. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. Peer Review in Health Sciences. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2003. pp. 1-13.

Armstrong JS. Peer review for journals: evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation. Sci Eng Ethics 1997; 3:63–84.

Kassirer JP, Campion EW. Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable. JAMA 1994; 272:96–7.

Goodman SN, Berlin J, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med1994; 121:11–21.

Marušic′ A, Lukic′ IK, Marušic′ M, McNamee D, Sharp D, Horton R. Peer review in a small and a big medical journal: case study of the Croatian Medical Journal and The Lancet. Croat Med J 1992; 43:286–9.

Callaham M. The evaluation and training of peer reviewers. In: Peer Review in Health Sciences (Second edition). In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. Peer Review in Health Sciences. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2003. pp. 164-82.

Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. Peer Review in Health Sciences. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2003.

Hames I. Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2007.

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61(4):344-9.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(6): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097

Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep 2013; doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-201554

Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30:239–45.

Downloads

Published

27-04-2015

How to Cite

Ameen, S., and S. K. Praharaj. “Developing Peer Review System for a Small Journal - The KJP Experience”. Kerala Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 28, no. 1, Apr. 2015, pp. 1-5, https://kjponline.com/index.php/kjp/article/view/25.