A Cross-Sectional Study of Perceived Human Rights in Mentally Ill
Abstract
Background: People with mental illness may experience wide range of human rights violations. Quantifying perceived human rights in mentally ill and putting it into perspective will help to systematically identify areas for intervention and to monitor their effectiveness.
Objectives: To compare perceived human rights in persons with mental illness to a group of individuals without mental illness, and to assess if the perceived human rights have any relationship with sociodemographic variables.
Methods: Data were collected from two groups: the first group comprised of 72 mentally ill persons (MI group) attending the community mental health clinics of Kannur district in the Indian state of Kerala, and the second group comprised of 72 individuals without mental illness (Non-MI group) who were visitors to patients in a government hospital. A comparative, cross sectional design was used. A demographic proforma tool, Human Rights Questionnaire (HR-14), and HR–Work supplementary tool (HR-Work) were used to collect information.
Results: MI group reported significant deficits in overall fulfillment of perceived human rights, specifically in the in the interindividual and work domains. Significant deficits were also detected in certain items related to health care and community in the MI group.
Conclusion: Mentally ill perceive considerable deficits in the fulfillment of human rights in various areas. These findings are relevant in many respects.
References
World Health Organization. Investing in Mental Health, Geneva.2003 [cited 2015 Jan 15] Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/investingmnh.pdf
Channabasavanna SM, Murthy P. The National Human Rights Commission Report 1999: A Defining Moment. In, Agarwal, S P. eds. Mental Health: An Indian Perspective - 1946–2003. Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, 2004.
World Health Organization. Mental Health, Human Rights & Legislation. WHO Geneva. [cited 2015 Jan 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/legislation/policy/en/
Vijayalakshmi P, Ramachandra, Reddemma K, Math SB. Perceived human rights violation in persons with mental illness: role of education. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2013; 59(4):351-64.
Poreddi V, Ramachandra, Reddemma K, Math SB. People with mental illness and human rights: A developing countries perspective. Indian J Psychiatry 2013; 55(2):117-24.
Wildner M, Fischer R, Brunner A. Development of a questionnaire for quantitative assessment in the field of health and human rights. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55(10):1725-44.
King IM. King's conceptual system, theory of goal attainment, and transaction process in the 21st century. Nurs Sci Q 2007; 20:109-11.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: WHO; 1993.
Shamsunder C, Sriram TG, Muraliraj SG, Shanmughan V. Validity of a short 5-items version of the General Health Questionnaire. Indian J Psychiatry 1986; 28:3,217-19.
Denise FP, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: 2004.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 1988.
Fischer R, Wildner M, Brunner A. Health and human rights--development of a questionnaire for measuring perceived human rights status. Soz Praventivmed 2000; 45:4.
Harkness J. Questionnaire Translation. In Harkness JA, van de Vijver FJR, Mohler PM, editors. Crosscultural Survey Methods. New York: John Wiley, 2003.
Corrigan P, Thompson V, Lambert D, Sangster Y, Noel JG, Campbell J. Perceptions of discrimination among persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54(8):1105-10.
Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51:8.
Government of Kerala. Civil Supplies Department: Schemes and Programmes. Available from http://www.civilsupplieskerala.gov.in/index.php/acts-and-rules
Regier DA, Boyd JH, Rae DS, Burke JD, Locke BZ, Myers JK, et al. One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the U.S.: Based on five epidemiologic catchment area (ECA) sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45:977.
Holzinger A, Beck M, Munk I, Weithaas S, Angermeyer MC. Stigma as perceived by schizophrenics and depressives. Psychiatr Prax 2003; 30(7):395-401.
Thornicroft G, Brohan E, Rose D, Sartorius N, Leese M, INDIGO Study Group. Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2009; 373(9661):408-15.
Thornicroft G, Rose D, Kassam A. Discrimination in health care against people with mental illness. Int Rev Psychiatry 2007; 19(2):113-22.
Bradshaw W, Roseborough D, Armour MP. Recovery from severe mental illness: the lived experience of the initial phase of treatment. Int J Psychoso Rehabil 2006; 10(1):123-31.
Krupa T, Kirsh B, Cockburn L, Gewurtz R. Understanding the stigma of mental illness in employment. Work 2009; 33(4):413-25.
Manning C, White PD. Attitudes of employers to the mentally ill. Psych Bull 1995; 19:541-3.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Kerala Journal of Psychiatry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
